Posts tagged plastic surgery

5 Quick Facts: Body Contouring after Major Weight Loss.

0
Major Weight Loss Options

Major Weight Loss Options

1. The most common procedure includes a circumferential incision beginning low in the front going around the hips and ending in the middle above the buttocks.

2. The procedure is most often performed in a hospital operating room with a 2 or 3 day stay after surgery.

3. The length of the procedure is between 4 to 6 hours.

4. The average downtime is about 2 weeks.

5. The complication rate is about 50 percent, but most complications are minor wound healing problems.

For more information on plastic surgery after major weight loss check out our website at www.MyFaceAndBody.com.

(model used in illustration).

Caution: Fat Grafting to Lower Eyelids, why I don't do it.

0

Scottsdale – Fat grafting is a popular procedure for rejuvenation of the face and contour improvement in the face and body. I have used fat grafting for the past 8 years to compliment my facelift technique and for body contour improvement. I recommend fat grafting for many conditions except in breast augmentation and eyelid rejuvenation.

A recent article in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery reviews the potential complications which can result from fat grafting to the lower eyelids. The study presents a single case where a patient received fat grafting to the lower eyelids 5 years before consulting with the senior author of the article. The patient had the initial procedure in Germany and experienced a deformity of the eyelids at the time. According to the patient, she had a second fat graft procedure in an attempt to correct the deformity created by the first procedure. The result was worse and as time passed the patient became increasingly dissatisfied with the appearance of her eyelids.

The patient presented for correction and a surgical lower blepharoplasty approach was used. The fat graft was viable after 5 years and was located in a non-anatomical location between the skin and the orbicular muscle. Interestingly, there was no need to remove any orbicular fat. All the fat graft was successfully removed. The total volume of fat graft removed was 1.2 cc from the right and 1.8 cc from the left eyelid.

This case illustrates a couple of important facts about fat grafting. First, fat grafting like all other plastic surgery procedures can be associated with complications and may even require re-operation to obtain a better outcome. Second, fat grafts are more likely to be problematic when the fat is placed superficially where it is more likely to create contour deformity as shown in this case. In the eyelid, because it is so anatomically thin, the margin for error is very low, as there is a good chance some of the fat graft could end up in a shallow location. There are very good surgeons who can avoid this complication, but I have seen this exact complication in many patients even in the hands of experienced clinicians. For eyelids, I believe that standard blepharoplasty techniques are more predictable than fat grafting.

I am a proponent of fat grafting when I can place it deeply. Fat grafting can be performed safely and can be successful in achieving aesthetic goals. When I perform fat grafting to the face, for instance, I use a low pressure injection technique with very small volume placed per injection. The article points out that inappropriate injection technique has likely contributed to the very serious complications of fat grafting previously reported by other authors.

Know your Options: Plastic Surgery after Major Weight Loss

0
Plastic surgery after major weight loss.

Plastic surgery after major weight loss.

Scottsdale- Weight reduction surgery is becoming ever more popular as the demand continues to accelerate. Patients should know what options are available to them after loosing all that weight. Once the ideal weight is achieved, many patients consider plastic surgery to improve their body contour. On the blog, I plan to review important articles related to obesity surgery and body contouring after major weight loss.

Some of the topics included include:

Indications for Bodylift Surgery

Mid-body contouring after bariatric surgery

Quality of Life after abdominoplasty and major weight loss

Modified vertical abdominoplasty after major weight loss surgery

Outpatient extended abdominoplasty in the massive weight loss patient

Thigh and buttock lift after massive weight loss

Mons Pubis management after major weight loss

and many more…..

(model used in illustration).

Absorbable dermal staplers – success!

0

Scottsdale – The absorbable INSORB dermal stapler is believed to be faster and more cost effective than sutures for dermal layer closures and provides a safer and more consistent result without compromising on the cosmetic results. This is the first study which supports this technique as a successful option for wound closure and is reported in the July issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal. Closure with dermal sutures is time consuming, is believed increase the risks of inflammation and infection secondary to foreign body reaction, and has variable cosmetic outcomes depending on each surgeon’s technique and skill.

The study was carried out as a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction with tissue expanders had one incision randomized to dermal closure with absorbable dermal staples. The other side was closed with dermal sutures. During the expansion period, wounds were assessed by a blinded plastic surgeon using the 13-point Vancouver Scar Scale. Later, when the expander was removed and a permanent implant placed, both scars were excised and examined under the microscope for histologic signs of inflammation.

The results were excellent for the absorbable internal stapling device. Eleven patients (22 breast incisions) were enrolled in the study. The Insorb dermal stapler was four times faster than standard suture closure, reducing closure time by 10.5 minutes, a statistically significant difference between the two techniques. The cost savings with the dermal stapler was $220 per surgery. In the early postoperative period, the dermal stapler had a higher score versus the sutures because of superior wound eversion, a beneficial characteristic for wound healing. At 4 months after surgery, no significant difference in scar scores was found between interventions. At 6 months, histologic analysis suggested decreased inflammatory cell invasion of the dermal stapler-closed scar.

The researchers concluded that using the absorbable dermal stapler can be performed significantly faster than standard suture closure techniques, allowing for a more cost-effective incisional closure with equivalent cosmetic results. I have been using this dermal device for 2 years and I conclude that it helps to create excellent scarring and in many cases beautiful scars that fade quickly.

Go to Top